+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs GPT-4.1 nano
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 nano leads with 20.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, GPT-4.1 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
1 month newer
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:44.3%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:65.2%(+20.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
1 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:44.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:65.2%(+20.9%)
Providers:1