+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs GPT OSS 20B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT OSS 20B leads with 34.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs. GPT OSS 20B is available on 4 providers. Overall, GPT OSS 20B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-OSS 20B was created as a smaller open-source variant, designed to balance capability with accessibility for researchers and developers. Built with 20 billion parameters, it provides a more approachable entry point for those seeking to work with open-source language models while benefiting from OpenAI's architectural insights.
2 months newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
GPT OSS 20B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:44.3%
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
Average Score:78.4%(+34.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
4 providers
Groq
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:44.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
Avg Score:78.4%(+34.1%)
Providers:4