+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Grok-2 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 mini leads with 20.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Grok-2 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 Mini was created as a more efficient variant of Grok 2, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make Grok 2's advancements accessible to applications with tighter resource constraints, it balances performance with practical deployment needs.
9 months newer
Grok-2 mini
xAI
2024-08-13
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:53.6%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Average Score:73.7%(+20.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:53.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-2 mini
Avg Score:73.7%(+20.2%)
Providers:0