+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Jamba 1.5 Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Jamba 1.5 Large leads with 15.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs. Jamba 1.5 Large is available on 2 providers. Overall, Jamba 1.5 Large is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large was developed by AI21 Labs using a hybrid architecture combining transformer and state space models, designed to provide efficient long-context understanding. Built to handle extended documents and conversations with computational efficiency, it represents AI21's innovation in efficient large-scale model design.
9 months newer
Jamba 1.5 Large
AI21 Labs
2024-08-22
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:50.2%
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Average Score:66.1%(+15.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Jamba 1.5 Large
2024-03-05
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
2 providers
Bedrock
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:50.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Jamba 1.5 Large
Avg Score:66.1%(+15.9%)
Providers:2