+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Kimi K2 0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 32.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs. Kimi K2 0905 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
3 months newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:53.6%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:85.8%(+32.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
2 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:53.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:85.8%(+32.2%)
Providers:2