+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Kimi K2 Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 32.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
1 month newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:45.2%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:77.7%(+32.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:45.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:77.7%(+32.5%)
Providers:1