+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct leads with 8.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
7 months newer
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:49.8%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Average Score:58.2%(+8.5%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
6 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:49.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Avg Score:58.2%(+8.5%)
Providers:6