+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct leads with 22.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
5 months newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:55.0%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:77.0%(+22.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:55.0%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:77.0%(+22.0%)
Providers:9