+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Medium leads with 45.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Magistral Medium is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium was introduced as a specialized model for advanced reasoning and analytical tasks, designed to handle complex problem-solving scenarios. Built to serve enterprise and professional applications requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Mistral's focus on high-quality analytical capabilities.
21 days newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:16.2%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:62.0%(+45.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:16.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:62.0%(+45.8%)
Providers:0