+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Magistral Small 2506
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Small 2506 leads with 44.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Magistral Small 2506 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Small was created as an efficient reasoning-focused variant, designed to bring analytical capabilities to applications with tighter resource constraints. Built to balance problem-solving depth with practical deployment needs, it extends reasoning-enhanced AI to broader use cases.
21 days newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
Magistral Small 2506
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:16.2%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Average Score:60.7%(+44.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
Magistral Small 2506
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:16.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Avg Score:60.7%(+44.6%)
Providers:0