+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview leads with 28.5% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 28 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
Launched on the same date
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Average performance across 35 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:40.2%(+28.5%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:11.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:40.2%(+28.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:11.7%
Providers:0