+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral NeMo Instruct leads with 5.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Mistral NeMo Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
10 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:61.3%
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:66.7%(+5.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:61.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:66.7%(+5.4%)
Providers:2