+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-mini leads with 24.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs. o1-mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, o1-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
8 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:54.5%
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:79.2%(+24.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:54.5%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:79.2%(+24.7%)
Providers:2