+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs o1-pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-pro leads with 55.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, o1-pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-pro was developed as an enhanced version of the o1 reasoning model, designed to provide extended reasoning capabilities with greater depth and reliability. Built for professionals and advanced users tackling complex analytical tasks, it offers enhanced thinking time and reasoning quality for the most demanding applications.
5 months newer
o1-pro
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:23.7%
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Average Score:79.0%(+55.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o1-pro
2023-09-30
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:23.7%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Avg Score:79.0%(+55.3%)
Providers:0