+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs o3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 67.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
1 month newer
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:17.6%
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:84.9%(+67.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o3
1 providers
OpenAI
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:17.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:84.9%(+67.2%)
Providers:1