+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs o3-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3-mini leads with 35.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs. o3-mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, o3-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
3 months newer
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:49.8%
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Average Score:85.4%(+35.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:49.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:85.4%(+35.6%)
Providers:2