+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini leads with 4.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
3 months newer
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 11 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:61.6%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:66.4%(+4.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:61.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:66.4%(+4.9%)
Providers:0