+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads with 18.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT LiteRT Preview was introduced as an experimental LiteRT-optimized version, designed to showcase advanced on-device AI capabilities. Built to demonstrate the feasibility of running capable instruction-tuned models on mobile platforms, it represents the cutting edge of edge AI development.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-VL 32B was developed as a mid-sized vision-language model, designed to balance multimodal capability with practical deployment considerations. Built with 32 billion parameters for vision and language integration, it serves applications requiring strong visual understanding without flagship-scale resources.
2 months newer
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-02-28
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Average Score:55.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Average Score:73.7%(+18.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Avg Score:55.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Avg Score:73.7%(+18.2%)
Providers:0