+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs GLM-4.5-Air
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 3.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. Notable strengths include HumanEval (75.0%), MGSM (67.0%), MMLU (64.9%). The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 29 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:26.1%
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:29.4%(+3.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:26.1%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:29.4%(+3.3%)
Providers:0