+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs GPT-4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4 leads with 8.3% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4 offers 1.5K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is $30.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4 was created as a large multimodal model capable of accepting image and text inputs while producing text outputs. Developed to exhibit human-level performance on various professional and academic benchmarks, it marked a significant advancement in reliability, creativity, and handling of nuanced instructions compared to its predecessors.
2 years newer
GPT-4
OpenAI
2023-06-13
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00($30.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Input:$30.00
Output:$60.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:57.6%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Average Score:65.9%(+8.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4
2022-12-31
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:57.6%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4
Avg Score:65.9%(+8.3%)
Providers:2