+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs GPT-4.1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4.1 leads with 34.2% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 offers 1.0M more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. GPT-4.1 is $50.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 represents an iterative improvement in the GPT-4 series, developed to refine the foundational capabilities established by GPT-4. Built to incorporate learnings and optimizations from the deployment of previous versions, it continues the evolution of OpenAI's flagship model line with enhanced reliability and performance.
2 months newer
GPT-4.1
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00($50.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:33.4%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Average Score:67.6%(+34.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
GPT-4.1
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:33.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1
Avg Score:67.6%(+34.2%)
Providers:1