+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs GPT-4o
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o leads with 30.4% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o offers 80.4K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. GPT-4o is $47.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4o is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
This updated version of GPT-4o was released with refinements to its multimodal capabilities and improved performance across text, vision, and audio tasks. Built to incorporate learnings from the initial GPT-4o deployment, it enhanced reliability and accuracy while maintaining the seamless cross-modal reasoning that defines the GPT-4o family.
10 months newer
GPT-4o
OpenAI
2024-08-06
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Input:$2.50
Output:$10.00($47.50 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:46.4%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Average Score:76.8%(+30.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:46.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o
Avg Score:76.8%(+30.4%)
Providers:2