+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs GPT-4o mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o mini leads with 16.4% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o mini offers 80.4K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. GPT-4o mini is $59.25 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-4o mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
11 months newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.60($59.25 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:57.6%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:74.1%(+16.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:57.6%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:74.1%(+16.4%)
Providers:1