+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs GPT-5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 leads with 47.8% higher average benchmark score. GPT-5 offers 464.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. GPT-5 is $48.75 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 represents the next generation of OpenAI's foundational models, developed to advance the frontier of AI capabilities in reasoning, knowledge, and general intelligence. Built to push beyond the limitations of GPT-4, it incorporates architectural and training improvements designed to enhance performance across diverse tasks and domains.
1 month newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
GPT-5
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
+
+
+
+
GPT-5
Input:$1.25
Output:$10.00($48.75 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:43.8%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5
Average Score:91.5%(+47.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
GPT-5
2024-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-5
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:43.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-5
Avg Score:91.5%(+47.8%)
Providers:2