+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs GPT-5 mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 mini leads with 69.1% higher average benchmark score. GPT-5 mini offers 464.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. GPT-5 mini is $57.75 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GPT-5 mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Mini was created as a more accessible version of GPT-5, designed to provide strong capabilities with improved efficiency and lower operational costs. Built to extend GPT-5's advancements to a broader range of applications, it balances advanced performance with practical deployment considerations.
1 month newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
GPT-5 mini
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
Input:$0.25
Output:$2.00($57.75 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:17.6%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
Average Score:86.7%(+69.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 mini
2024-05-30
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:17.6%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 mini
Avg Score:86.7%(+69.1%)
Providers:2