+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Granite 3.3 8B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base leads with 6.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Granite 3.3 8B Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base was developed by IBM as an enterprise-focused foundation model, designed to provide a reliable starting point for business applications. Built with 8 billion parameters and trained on curated data, it serves as a foundation for domain-specific customization in enterprise contexts.
2 months newer
Granite 3.3 8B Base
IBM
2025-04-16
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:70.0%
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Average Score:76.8%(+6.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Base
2024-04-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:70.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Avg Score:76.8%(+6.9%)
Providers:0