+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct leads with 7.7% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Granite 3.3 8B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the Granite base model, designed to follow instructions reliably in enterprise settings. Built to serve business applications requiring dependable language understanding, it provides IBM's accessible interface for enterprise AI.
2 months newer
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
IBM
2025-04-16
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:70.0%
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Average Score:77.6%(+7.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
2024-04-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:70.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Granite 3.3 8B Instruct
Avg Score:77.6%(+7.7%)
Providers:0