+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Grok-2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-2 leads with 23.3% higher average benchmark score. Grok-2 offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Grok-2 is $48.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
10 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00($48.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:53.6%
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:76.8%(+23.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:53.6%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:76.8%(+23.3%)
Providers:1