+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Grok-3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 69.6% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Grok-3 is $42.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
4 months newer
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00($42.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:16.2%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:85.8%(+69.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Grok-3
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:16.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:85.8%(+69.6%)
Providers:1