+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Grok-3 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 Mini leads with 68.9% higher average benchmark score. Grok-3 Mini offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Grok-3 Mini is $59.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-3 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 Mini was developed as an efficient version of Grok 3, designed to bring next-generation capabilities to resource-conscious deployments. Built to provide strong performance with practical efficiency, it extends Grok 3's innovations to broader application scenarios.
4 months newer
Grok-3 Mini
xAI
2025-02-17
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Input:$0.30
Output:$0.50($59.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:16.2%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Average Score:85.1%(+68.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Grok-3 Mini
2024-11-17
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:16.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-3 Mini
Avg Score:85.1%(+68.9%)
Providers:1