+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Kimi K2 Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Base leads with 22.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base was created as the foundation model in the K2 series, designed to serve as a starting point for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide strong base capabilities for domain-specific applications, it enables developers to build specialized solutions on Moonshot's architecture.
15 days newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:46.4%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:68.4%(+22.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:46.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:68.4%(+22.0%)
Providers:0