+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Scout leads with 19.9% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.9M more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Llama 4 Scout is $59.62 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Llama 4 Scout is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
2 months newer
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($59.62 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:47.2%
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:67.1%(+19.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:47.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:67.1%(+19.9%)
Providers:6