+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed leads with 13.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. Notable strengths include HumanEval (75.0%), MGSM (67.0%), MMLU (64.9%). The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:30.3%(+13.9%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:16.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:30.3%(+13.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:16.4%
Providers:0