+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct leads with 18.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct represents a further evolution of the Small model series, developed with continued refinements to instruction-following and task performance. Built to incorporate ongoing improvements, it provides the latest capabilities in Mistral's intermediate-scale offering.
6 days newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:46.4%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:64.6%(+18.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:46.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:64.6%(+18.2%)
Providers:0