+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Nova Lite
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Nova Lite leads with 14.8% higher average benchmark score. Nova Lite offers 238.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Nova Lite is $59.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Nova Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Lite was developed as a lightweight multimodal model, designed to provide efficient AI capabilities for text and image understanding. Built to serve cost-sensitive applications with quick response times, it represents Amazon's entry-level offering in the Nova family.
7 months newer
Nova Lite
Amazon
2024-11-20
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Input:$0.06
Output:$0.24($59.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:54.5%
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Average Score:69.3%(+14.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:54.5%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Nova Lite
Avg Score:69.3%(+14.8%)
Providers:1