Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 18.3% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 236.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is $15.00 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. Notable strengths include HumanEval (75.0%), MGSM (67.0%), MMLU (64.9%). The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
o1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 33 common benchmarks
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
o1
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Together
o1
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
o1
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
o1
Azure
OpenAI