+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs o1-pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1-pro leads with 55.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, o1-pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-pro was developed as an enhanced version of the o1 reasoning model, designed to provide extended reasoning capabilities with greater depth and reliability. Built for professionals and advanced users tackling complex analytical tasks, it offers enhanced thinking time and reasoning quality for the most demanding applications.
6 months newer
o1-pro
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:23.7%
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Average Score:79.0%(+55.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o1-pro
2023-09-30
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:23.7%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Avg Score:79.0%(+55.3%)
Providers:0