+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs o3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3 leads with 67.2% higher average benchmark score. o3 offers 236.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. o3 is $50.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, o3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3 represents the next generation in OpenAI's reasoning model series, developed to advance the capabilities of deliberate, step-by-step problem solving. Built to handle increasingly complex challenges across mathematics, science, and coding, it continues the evolution of reasoning-focused AI with improved analytical depth and accuracy.
2 months newer
o3
OpenAI
2025-04-16
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
+
+
+
+
o3
Input:$2.00
Output:$8.00($50.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:17.6%
+
+
+
+
o3
Average Score:84.9%(+67.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3
2024-05-31
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
o3
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:17.6%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o3
Avg Score:84.9%(+67.2%)
Providers:1