Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct leads with 24.7% higher average benchmark score. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct offers 192.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is $59.80 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. Notable strengths include HumanEval (75.0%), MGSM (67.0%), MMLU (64.9%). The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. The model shows competitive results across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (86.2%), ARC-C (84.6%), RULER (84.1%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 43 common benchmarks
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Together
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Azure