+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 18.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed offers 32.0K more tokens in context window than Phi 4. Phi 4 is $59.79 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
6 months newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14($59.79 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:56.2%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:74.9%(+18.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:56.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:74.9%(+18.7%)
Providers:1