+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Pixtral-12B offers 72.2K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Pixtral-12B is $59.70 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
9 months newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input:$20.00
Output:$40.00
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($59.70 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Average Score:70.0%
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:70.6%(+0.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1 providers
Together
Throughput: 42.09 tok/s
Latency: 0.43ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Avg Score:70.0%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:70.6%(+0.6%)
Providers:1