Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 48.5% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking offers 67.1K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $58.35 cheaper per million tokens. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
2 months newer

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Together

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita