+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo leads with 9.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. GPT-3.5 Turbo is available on 2 providers. Overall, GPT-3.5 Turbo is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B was developed as a slightly larger edge-optimized variant, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while still fitting within edge computing constraints. Built to serve applications that can accommodate more parameters for improved quality, it expands the range of edge deployment options.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
2 years newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:60.8%
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:70.2%(+9.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:60.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:70.2%(+9.4%)
Providers:2