+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs GPT-4o mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-4o mini leads with 18.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, GPT-4o mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B was developed as a slightly larger edge-optimized variant, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while still fitting within edge computing constraints. Built to serve applications that can accommodate more parameters for improved quality, it expands the range of edge deployment options.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
11 months newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:60.8%
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:79.7%(+18.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
1 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:60.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:79.7%(+18.9%)
Providers:1