+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs GPT OSS 20B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B leads with 19.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. GPT OSS 20B is available on 4 providers. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT OSS 20B is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (85.3%), CodeForces (83.9%), GPQA (71.5%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
GPT OSS 20B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:39.5%(+19.2%)
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
Average Score:20.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
4 providers
Groq
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:39.5%(+19.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT OSS 20B
Avg Score:20.3%
Providers:4