+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B leads with 5.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B was developed as a slightly larger edge-optimized variant, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while still fitting within edge computing constraints. Built to serve applications that can accommodate more parameters for improved quality, it expands the range of edge deployment options.
+
+
+
+
IBM
Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was introduced as an experimental ultra-compact model, designed to demonstrate IBM's progress in efficient model development. Built to explore the boundaries of what small models can achieve for enterprise applications, it represents an early look at next-generation Granite capabilities.
1 month newer
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
IBM
2025-05-02
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:56.9%(+5.9%)
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Average Score:51.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:56.9%(+5.9%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Avg Score:51.0%
Providers:0