+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs Grok-1.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B leads with 6.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-1.5 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (90.0%), DocVQA (85.6%), MMLU (81.3%). Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Grok-1.5
xAI
2024-03-28
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:35.5%(+6.8%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5
Average Score:28.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:35.5%(+6.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5
Avg Score:28.7%
Providers:0