+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs Kimi K2 Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Base leads with 8.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.2% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in C-Eval (92.5%), GSM8k (92.1%), MMLU-redux-2.0 (90.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
15 days newer
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:30.9%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:39.1%(+8.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:30.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:39.1%(+8.2%)
Providers:0