+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs Kimi K2 Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Base leads with 14.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 Base is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B was developed as a slightly larger edge-optimized variant, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while still fitting within edge computing constraints. Built to serve applications that can accommodate more parameters for improved quality, it expands the range of edge deployment options.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Base was created as the foundation model in the K2 series, designed to serve as a starting point for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide strong base capabilities for domain-specific applications, it enables developers to build specialized solutions on Moonshot's architecture.
15 days newer
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Kimi K2 Base
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:70.2%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Average Score:85.1%(+14.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:70.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Base
Avg Score:85.1%(+14.9%)
Providers:0