+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 29.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is available on 8 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B was developed as a slightly larger edge-optimized variant, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while still fitting within edge computing constraints. Built to serve applications that can accommodate more parameters for improved quality, it expands the range of edge deployment options.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 405B was developed as Meta's largest open-source language model, designed to provide frontier-level capabilities with 405 billion parameters. Built to demonstrate that open-source models can match proprietary systems in capability, it enables researchers and developers to experiment with and deploy a powerful foundation model without licensing restrictions.
11 months newer
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:61.2%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Average Score:90.8%(+29.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
8 providers
Bedrock
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:61.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Avg Score:90.8%(+29.6%)
Providers:8