+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B leads with 13.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:41.8%(+13.9%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:28.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:41.8%(+13.9%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:28.0%
Providers:0